Iowa Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs for the District of Massachusetts, entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
One of the highest points of vulnerability for law firm exists when they are conducting wire transfers during a class action payment, said Todd Doss,...
Continue Reading
This article offers up some thoughts about how lawyers ought to access and manage resources in order to provide a multi-faceted, full-service...
Continue Reading
Consumers’ online reviews of lawyers have been deemed a matter of public concern for SLAPP purposes in California, New York, Washington and Oregon, said defense attorney Bruce Rosen.
“Neither Musk’s past success nor his importance to Tesla’s business gives him carte blanche to treat his fiduciary duties to Tesla as optional,” the complaint states.
Munsch Hardt was able to rebut the allegations because Michaels could show it was developing its own paint-by-numbers product months before it met with the plaintiffs, shareholder Jamil N. Alibhai said.
The court ultimately concluded that the jury properly determined that the committee didn’t make fair use of the template because the fair-use test weighs heavily in the plaintiff’s favor.